Ethics in Congress

The best way to address the problem of lobbyist influence is to eliminate the ease of obtaining earmarks (special projects money in appropriations bills). Spending money on special projects should not be based on the seniority or position of a member of Congress, but based on the need in the community.

The Congressman has co-sponsored legislation (H. Res. 662) that will address the abuses of earmarks. H. Res. 662 will compile the list of all earmarks from appropriations bills and attribute each earmark to the Member of Congress sponsoring the earmark. This will allow the public to see exactly what projects are being funded in each congressional district. This will help to keep each Member of Congress accountable for their requested appropriations. This legislation will make the government process transparent, and it will help to promote a more responsible and honest government in Washington.

Those members who have acted improperly under current law are facing the consequences--as they should. But Congress should carefully weigh how it addresses the issues surrounding reforming the process, and should not merely pass more laws as a knee-jerk reaction to the issue.

Individuals and organizations have a right protected by the U.S. Constitution to present their issues and concerns to the Congress. Members of Congress are elected to hear those concerns and represent them to the rest of the nation. In discussions to restrict lobbying, members of Congress must make sure they are not preventing people from bringing their concerns to us.